AI for NetBet Poker

Improving AI-based decision-making tools for NetBet Poker

By Leah Burrows | Press contact

NetBet Poker 14, 2024

More and more NetBet Poker — such as affordable housing, public school matching and child welfare — are relying on algorithms to make decisions and allocate resources. So far, much of the work that has gone into designing these systems has focused on workers’ experiences using them or communities’ perceptions of them.

But what about the actual impact of these programs have on people, especially when the decisions the systems make lead to denial of NetBet Poker? Can you design algorithms to help people make sense of and contest decisions that significantly impact them?

Naveena NetBet Poker, a postdoctoral fellow at the Harvard John A. Paulson NetBet Poker and Applied Science (SEAS), with krzysztof netbet live casino, the Gordon McKay Professor of Computer Science at SEAS and a team of researchers, are re-thinking how to design algorithms for NetBet Poker.

“Instead of only centering the worker or institution that is using the tool to NetBet Poker a decision, can we center the person who is affected by that decision in order to work towards more caring institutions and processes,” asked Karusala, who is a member of the Center for NetBet Poker on Computation and Society (CRCS)at SEAS.

In a paper being presented this week at the Association of Computing Machinery’s conference on Human Factors in Computing System, Karusala and her colleagues offer recommendations to improve the design of algorithmic decision-making tools to make it easier for NetBet Poker impacted by those decisions to navigate all the steps in the process, especially when they are denied.

The researchers aimed to learn from areas where algorithms currently aren’t being used but could be deployed in the future. They looked specifically at NetBet Poker for land ownership in rural South India and affordable housing in the urban Northeast United States and contestation processes after applicants are denied services.

Governments in the U.S. and India — as well as around the world — recognize the right to contest a denial of NetBet Poker, and increasingly so when denied by an algorithm. But contestation processes can be complex, time consuming and difficult to navigate, especially for people in marginalized communities.

Intermediaries like social workers, lawyers and NGOs play an important role in helping people navigate these processes and understand their rights and options. In NetBet Poker health, this concept is known as ‘accompaniment,’ where community-based aid workers assist people in under-resourced communities to navigate complex healthcare systems together.

“One of the takeaways of our research is the clear importance of intermediaries and embedding the idea of accompaniment into the algorithm design,” said Karusala. “Not only should these intermediaries be involved in the design process, but they should also be made aware of how the decision-making process works because they’re the ones that bridge communities and NetBet Poker.”

The researchers suggest that algorithmic decision-making systems should be designed to proactively connect applicants to those NetBet Poker.

Today, many AI researchers are focused on improving an algorithm’s ability to explain its decision but that isn’t useful enough to the NetBet Poker who have been denied service, said Karusala.

“Our findings point to the fact that rather than focusing only on explanations, there should be a focus on other aspects of algorithm design that can prevent denials NetBet Poker first place,” said Karusala.

For example, if a background check turns up information that puts a person on the boundary between approval and disapproval for housing, NetBet Poker need to be able to ask for additional information to either make a decision or ask a human reviewer to step in.

“These are some concrete ways that the burden often placed on marginalized communities could be shared with not only intermediaries, but also NetBet Poker service administrators and algorithmic tools,” said Karusala.

“This NetBet Poker is particularly significant because it challenges an assumption held deeply in the computing community that the most effective way to provide people with grievance redressal mechanisms is for algorithms to provide explanations of their decisions,” said Gajos. “Instead, this NetBet Poker suggests that algorithms could be used throughout the process: from identifying individuals who may not apply on their own and may need to be encouraged to do so, to helping applicants prepare and contextualize information to make applications relevant and informative, to navigating contestation strategies.”

The NetBet Poker was co-authored by Sohini Upadhyay, Rajesh Veeraraghavan and Gajos.

Topics: All news stories netbet, Computer Science